Thursday, November 15, 2007
The Jewish musmuen
the trip to to the jewish musmneum was very cultural. It showed how imgrants have a hard time fitting in and adating. The english languange isn't a very easy one either. Many imigrants come to america for freedom but feel homesick. This opened my eyes to see that imigrants need help to adapt in and we should be more helpful.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
The event at the NCC
the event at the NCC was very interesting. A girl got in trouble for just making a myspace. Even throgh she put a disclaimer. This shows how the rights of teenagers are not always regonzied. This event gave us examples of how we are vioalted and how what rights we have. Many people are interested in handling cases with teens. This was fun and I liked it
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
freedom or security
I belive security is more important than freedom on the internet. Security is needed to help children our age and adults to protect themselvees. Though we need to have freedom we neede to be protected to right? For example , child predators are on the internet and will try to lure children. The security helps protect us . Also the internet has people trying to get numbers and adreddes, social security cards an d things. These people are just waiting. This is why securtiy is more important.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Water in Africa
Water in africa pics were very interesting to see. The Africans use their water with ease. We as Americans are greedy. We take our water for granted. For example, when we brush our teeth most of us leave the water on. This is watsing water. Other people in the world don't have acess to fresh , clean water inside . Americans need to see thesse things and start realizing that we can't do these things. To see these people is a sad thing but it is a eye opener . Everyone needs to start reserving in order to presevre our natural resources. The photo project was a good one.
Lawyers case for physical science
I was a secret lawyer and here is my arguements:
Lawyer’s case
Physical science
Good morning ladies and gentleman I’m Khalia Thompson and I’m Micheal Kelly. For the past week my partner and I have went undercover to investigate the violates to the Constitution and to humans.
You will first hear from Micheal Kelly about how the iChip is unsafe. Mike’s essay
The iChip created by various companies have not had an organized and stable testing facility, where the ichip were tested on its impact regarding human civilizations health.
In order for the iChip to be placed back on the market the iChip must be tested by professional scientists. Many trails and experiment must be ran on the iChip in order to conclude if the iChip is safe enough for human use.
The testing facilities must incremented tests on each part of the iChip assuring the 100 percent awareness and dangers of the product.
The iChip is very familiar to when the cell phone was uplifted in the mid 1990s. Some people were diagnoses with brain cancer during the beginning of the cell phone era.
Since many of the companies were getting sued, Congress decided to force the cell phone companies to open testing faculties to test the cell phones relation to brain cancer. The cell phone company found inconclusive results, allowing the cell phone to be placed back on the market.
The chip is unsafe and shouldn’t be or the market. Here are my partner’s arguments.
Yes the iChip would be more business efficient but wouldn’t it take away jobs? Like the computer engineering jobs etc. I f everyone at a business has an iChip then is no need for computers right?
Secondly the iChip violates the Fourth Amendments. Some manufactures put tracking devices their iCip. The Fourth Amendments protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government is seeing your every move. If you were to be at the scene of a crime the government could use this against you and would know you were there because of the tracking devices.
Imagine someone would give you 1 million dollars to make an ipod that record thoughts. This is exactly what is going on. Tab Inc, NTI, L&J, and Increase all are in it for the money. And I went undercover I have direct Quotes for example “ L&J said their only in it for the money and they care about the people but more about the people. This was pretty much the expression I received from all the groups. The 2 million dollars was a huge amount just for designing the iChip. I went undercover because the iChip manufactures won’t publicly admit to their true motives because of self-incrimations. This gives them the right not to publicly incrimate them selves.
Through the iChip has advantages it has too many flaws. The iChip should be immediately taken off the market till testing has been done. Thank You
Lawyer’s case
Physical science
Good morning ladies and gentleman I’m Khalia Thompson and I’m Micheal Kelly. For the past week my partner and I have went undercover to investigate the violates to the Constitution and to humans.
You will first hear from Micheal Kelly about how the iChip is unsafe. Mike’s essay
The iChip created by various companies have not had an organized and stable testing facility, where the ichip were tested on its impact regarding human civilizations health.
In order for the iChip to be placed back on the market the iChip must be tested by professional scientists. Many trails and experiment must be ran on the iChip in order to conclude if the iChip is safe enough for human use.
The testing facilities must incremented tests on each part of the iChip assuring the 100 percent awareness and dangers of the product.
The iChip is very familiar to when the cell phone was uplifted in the mid 1990s. Some people were diagnoses with brain cancer during the beginning of the cell phone era.
Since many of the companies were getting sued, Congress decided to force the cell phone companies to open testing faculties to test the cell phones relation to brain cancer. The cell phone company found inconclusive results, allowing the cell phone to be placed back on the market.
The chip is unsafe and shouldn’t be or the market. Here are my partner’s arguments.
Yes the iChip would be more business efficient but wouldn’t it take away jobs? Like the computer engineering jobs etc. I f everyone at a business has an iChip then is no need for computers right?
Secondly the iChip violates the Fourth Amendments. Some manufactures put tracking devices their iCip. The Fourth Amendments protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government is seeing your every move. If you were to be at the scene of a crime the government could use this against you and would know you were there because of the tracking devices.
Imagine someone would give you 1 million dollars to make an ipod that record thoughts. This is exactly what is going on. Tab Inc, NTI, L&J, and Increase all are in it for the money. And I went undercover I have direct Quotes for example “ L&J said their only in it for the money and they care about the people but more about the people. This was pretty much the expression I received from all the groups. The 2 million dollars was a huge amount just for designing the iChip. I went undercover because the iChip manufactures won’t publicly admit to their true motives because of self-incrimations. This gives them the right not to publicly incrimate them selves.
Through the iChip has advantages it has too many flaws. The iChip should be immediately taken off the market till testing has been done. Thank You
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)