Wednesday, October 31, 2007
freedom or security
I belive security is more important than freedom on the internet. Security is needed to help children our age and adults to protect themselvees. Though we need to have freedom we neede to be protected to right? For example , child predators are on the internet and will try to lure children. The security helps protect us . Also the internet has people trying to get numbers and adreddes, social security cards an d things. These people are just waiting. This is why securtiy is more important.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Water in Africa
Water in africa pics were very interesting to see. The Africans use their water with ease. We as Americans are greedy. We take our water for granted. For example, when we brush our teeth most of us leave the water on. This is watsing water. Other people in the world don't have acess to fresh , clean water inside . Americans need to see thesse things and start realizing that we can't do these things. To see these people is a sad thing but it is a eye opener . Everyone needs to start reserving in order to presevre our natural resources. The photo project was a good one.
Lawyers case for physical science
I was a secret lawyer and here is my arguements:
Lawyer’s case
Physical science
Good morning ladies and gentleman I’m Khalia Thompson and I’m Micheal Kelly. For the past week my partner and I have went undercover to investigate the violates to the Constitution and to humans.
You will first hear from Micheal Kelly about how the iChip is unsafe. Mike’s essay
The iChip created by various companies have not had an organized and stable testing facility, where the ichip were tested on its impact regarding human civilizations health.
In order for the iChip to be placed back on the market the iChip must be tested by professional scientists. Many trails and experiment must be ran on the iChip in order to conclude if the iChip is safe enough for human use.
The testing facilities must incremented tests on each part of the iChip assuring the 100 percent awareness and dangers of the product.
The iChip is very familiar to when the cell phone was uplifted in the mid 1990s. Some people were diagnoses with brain cancer during the beginning of the cell phone era.
Since many of the companies were getting sued, Congress decided to force the cell phone companies to open testing faculties to test the cell phones relation to brain cancer. The cell phone company found inconclusive results, allowing the cell phone to be placed back on the market.
The chip is unsafe and shouldn’t be or the market. Here are my partner’s arguments.
Yes the iChip would be more business efficient but wouldn’t it take away jobs? Like the computer engineering jobs etc. I f everyone at a business has an iChip then is no need for computers right?
Secondly the iChip violates the Fourth Amendments. Some manufactures put tracking devices their iCip. The Fourth Amendments protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government is seeing your every move. If you were to be at the scene of a crime the government could use this against you and would know you were there because of the tracking devices.
Imagine someone would give you 1 million dollars to make an ipod that record thoughts. This is exactly what is going on. Tab Inc, NTI, L&J, and Increase all are in it for the money. And I went undercover I have direct Quotes for example “ L&J said their only in it for the money and they care about the people but more about the people. This was pretty much the expression I received from all the groups. The 2 million dollars was a huge amount just for designing the iChip. I went undercover because the iChip manufactures won’t publicly admit to their true motives because of self-incrimations. This gives them the right not to publicly incrimate them selves.
Through the iChip has advantages it has too many flaws. The iChip should be immediately taken off the market till testing has been done. Thank You
Lawyer’s case
Physical science
Good morning ladies and gentleman I’m Khalia Thompson and I’m Micheal Kelly. For the past week my partner and I have went undercover to investigate the violates to the Constitution and to humans.
You will first hear from Micheal Kelly about how the iChip is unsafe. Mike’s essay
The iChip created by various companies have not had an organized and stable testing facility, where the ichip were tested on its impact regarding human civilizations health.
In order for the iChip to be placed back on the market the iChip must be tested by professional scientists. Many trails and experiment must be ran on the iChip in order to conclude if the iChip is safe enough for human use.
The testing facilities must incremented tests on each part of the iChip assuring the 100 percent awareness and dangers of the product.
The iChip is very familiar to when the cell phone was uplifted in the mid 1990s. Some people were diagnoses with brain cancer during the beginning of the cell phone era.
Since many of the companies were getting sued, Congress decided to force the cell phone companies to open testing faculties to test the cell phones relation to brain cancer. The cell phone company found inconclusive results, allowing the cell phone to be placed back on the market.
The chip is unsafe and shouldn’t be or the market. Here are my partner’s arguments.
Yes the iChip would be more business efficient but wouldn’t it take away jobs? Like the computer engineering jobs etc. I f everyone at a business has an iChip then is no need for computers right?
Secondly the iChip violates the Fourth Amendments. Some manufactures put tracking devices their iCip. The Fourth Amendments protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government is seeing your every move. If you were to be at the scene of a crime the government could use this against you and would know you were there because of the tracking devices.
Imagine someone would give you 1 million dollars to make an ipod that record thoughts. This is exactly what is going on. Tab Inc, NTI, L&J, and Increase all are in it for the money. And I went undercover I have direct Quotes for example “ L&J said their only in it for the money and they care about the people but more about the people. This was pretty much the expression I received from all the groups. The 2 million dollars was a huge amount just for designing the iChip. I went undercover because the iChip manufactures won’t publicly admit to their true motives because of self-incrimations. This gives them the right not to publicly incrimate them selves.
Through the iChip has advantages it has too many flaws. The iChip should be immediately taken off the market till testing has been done. Thank You
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
The CHS Constiution
The constiution for our school is fair but it has flaws. For instance the Constution doesn't outline the term for the president. So if a president wanted to stay in office then what? Also the excutive branch can be a 9grader and to be a judge you have to be a 10 grader. That doesn't make sense. But we are also making admentments so we have the right to change. But at least we have the right to propse the adments.
The Cat in the hat
Dear reader,
I chose for you to look at the entire body of my essay. I feel all my body has examples from story that help explain how the narrator is stick between those egos. I also would like for you to look at my at my voice. Ii feel my voice is normal and in my style. Also, it doesn't sound like a robot.
Sincerly,
Khalia Thompson
I chose for you to look at the entire body of my essay. I feel all my body has examples from story that help explain how the narrator is stick between those egos. I also would like for you to look at my at my voice. Ii feel my voice is normal and in my style. Also, it doesn't sound like a robot.
Sincerly,
Khalia Thompson
POG 2 letter
Dear reader ,
I chose my POG 2 because I feel opinoins are important and mine is too. I would like for you to look at my opening and first pargraph. I feel my opening has a topic sentence , hook , listes alll three key points. I chose for you to look a my first paragraph because I feel I have a transition and details and examples of the iDeal society. Also I followed all directions for what to include.
I chose my POG 2 because I feel opinoins are important and mine is too. I would like for you to look at my opening and first pargraph. I feel my opening has a topic sentence , hook , listes alll three key points. I chose for you to look a my first paragraph because I feel I have a transition and details and examples of the iDeal society. Also I followed all directions for what to include.
POG 2
Khalia Thompson
The Constitution Period 8, 9
Philosophy of Government II
Was the Constitution effectively protecting the U.S. in the ideal society? The Constitution failed to balance individual freedom and security because the president wasn’t able to stop the Freedom fight club, protect the public from terrorist attacks, or reinstate First Amendment rights.
Terrorism exists in the U.S. and in our iDeal society. The Constitution didn’t effectively help to catch the terrorist. The President couldn’t figure out who the terrorist were without bumping heads with Congress over the rights of the people. The Constitution ‘s First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the right of the people to peacefully to assemble, and to petition the government which gives terriost the right to protest. But citizens were openly protested the iChip outside the National Center, and it was blown up. The President proposed a bill that stopped violent protesters. Congress and citizens disagree and said the President was violating their freedom of speech and that Congress shall make no law doing that. The terrorist continued and the President wasn’t able a law banning violent protests. The President needed Congress’s approval for almost everything because of the checks and balances the Constitution created. One thing the President could do via execute order was declare anyone who was convicted of terriosm would have the death penalty. Congress didn’t agree at first but then they agreed it would be better for the country. The President didn’t need their approval for that. This was a check in the executive power. The checks and balances made it difficult to catch the terrorist with Congress and President butting heads.
The public should be protected and feel secure. Through the President couldn’t stop violent protesters, the President could act as Commander in Chief. The Constitution states, “ The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army & Navy of the U.S. In the iDeal society it was a war on the home front on terrorist. The President has the right to pursue decisions on these conflicts. Congress wouldn’t approve to declare a “ real war’, depending on the ones definition of a war. So via execute order the President put the death penalty in effect for anyone tried & convicted of terriosm. There was opposition from Congress but this was a check in the Presidents power. So even through the President couldn’t declare a “ real war’ on terriosm the President could make punishments. But this penalty didn’t really help because the terrorist was still blowing up public areas. The Constitution didn’t effectively help balance the power between Congress and the President.
We the people have the right to freedom of speech. During the iDeal society simulation, the citizens against the iChip posted signs & openly spoke out against the President, called for the President ‘s impeachment, and told everyone about their dislike of the iChip. Of course the citizens have the right to speak against the government but certain things can be considered a “present danger”. Such in other classes, a case was taken to the Supreme Court. In which they ruled the citizen didn’t present a " clear and present danger”. Even through we have the right to freedom of speech some things could be seen as a clear and present danger. The Constitution didn’t effectively balance individual freedoms & security.
To conclude my essay, the Constitution failed to balance individual freedoms & security because the president wasn’t able to stop the Freedom Fight Club, protect the public from terriost attacks, nor reinstate First Amendment rights.
The Constitution Period 8, 9
Philosophy of Government II
Was the Constitution effectively protecting the U.S. in the ideal society? The Constitution failed to balance individual freedom and security because the president wasn’t able to stop the Freedom fight club, protect the public from terrorist attacks, or reinstate First Amendment rights.
Terrorism exists in the U.S. and in our iDeal society. The Constitution didn’t effectively help to catch the terrorist. The President couldn’t figure out who the terrorist were without bumping heads with Congress over the rights of the people. The Constitution ‘s First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the right of the people to peacefully to assemble, and to petition the government which gives terriost the right to protest. But citizens were openly protested the iChip outside the National Center, and it was blown up. The President proposed a bill that stopped violent protesters. Congress and citizens disagree and said the President was violating their freedom of speech and that Congress shall make no law doing that. The terrorist continued and the President wasn’t able a law banning violent protests. The President needed Congress’s approval for almost everything because of the checks and balances the Constitution created. One thing the President could do via execute order was declare anyone who was convicted of terriosm would have the death penalty. Congress didn’t agree at first but then they agreed it would be better for the country. The President didn’t need their approval for that. This was a check in the executive power. The checks and balances made it difficult to catch the terrorist with Congress and President butting heads.
The public should be protected and feel secure. Through the President couldn’t stop violent protesters, the President could act as Commander in Chief. The Constitution states, “ The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army & Navy of the U.S. In the iDeal society it was a war on the home front on terrorist. The President has the right to pursue decisions on these conflicts. Congress wouldn’t approve to declare a “ real war’, depending on the ones definition of a war. So via execute order the President put the death penalty in effect for anyone tried & convicted of terriosm. There was opposition from Congress but this was a check in the Presidents power. So even through the President couldn’t declare a “ real war’ on terriosm the President could make punishments. But this penalty didn’t really help because the terrorist was still blowing up public areas. The Constitution didn’t effectively help balance the power between Congress and the President.
We the people have the right to freedom of speech. During the iDeal society simulation, the citizens against the iChip posted signs & openly spoke out against the President, called for the President ‘s impeachment, and told everyone about their dislike of the iChip. Of course the citizens have the right to speak against the government but certain things can be considered a “present danger”. Such in other classes, a case was taken to the Supreme Court. In which they ruled the citizen didn’t present a " clear and present danger”. Even through we have the right to freedom of speech some things could be seen as a clear and present danger. The Constitution didn’t effectively balance individual freedoms & security.
To conclude my essay, the Constitution failed to balance individual freedoms & security because the president wasn’t able to stop the Freedom Fight Club, protect the public from terriost attacks, nor reinstate First Amendment rights.
The Cat in the hat
Khalia Thompson
Section 1,2
Was Dr. Seuss implanting Freud’s psychical theory in the Cat In The Hat? Yes, Freud’s psychological theory is based on three parts the id, ego, and superego. The character I chose to analyze and fidget with is the narrator. Our narrator is stuck between the ego, and superego as the story starts. Superego dominated toward the end. The narrator’s speech, and actions, three indirect characterization proves my opinion.
“ I do not like the way that they play “, the narrator says. At the end or toward the end the narrator shows his superego kicking in. Superego is the moral part developed due to the moral part placed on us by caregivers. The narrator began to think about the mother’s absence & return.
Wasn’t the ego also working though? Of course. For example the narrator says, “ Sally and I did not know what to say”. This text appears at the begging. The ego knows the Cat in the Hat isn‘t allowed in the house when their unsupervised. But this ego is the stage in which the situation. But its still considering its own needs to have fun, which is the need of the id. The id doesn’t car about anyone else. This narrator’s indirect characterization shows its confusion between the ego & superego.
“ Now you do as I say “. You pack up these Things and you take them away.” This shows the superego dominating through and winning.
In conclusion to my thoughts, the narrator is torn at the beginning but matures into the superego toward the end.
Section 1,2
Was Dr. Seuss implanting Freud’s psychical theory in the Cat In The Hat? Yes, Freud’s psychological theory is based on three parts the id, ego, and superego. The character I chose to analyze and fidget with is the narrator. Our narrator is stuck between the ego, and superego as the story starts. Superego dominated toward the end. The narrator’s speech, and actions, three indirect characterization proves my opinion.
“ I do not like the way that they play “, the narrator says. At the end or toward the end the narrator shows his superego kicking in. Superego is the moral part developed due to the moral part placed on us by caregivers. The narrator began to think about the mother’s absence & return.
Wasn’t the ego also working though? Of course. For example the narrator says, “ Sally and I did not know what to say”. This text appears at the begging. The ego knows the Cat in the Hat isn‘t allowed in the house when their unsupervised. But this ego is the stage in which the situation. But its still considering its own needs to have fun, which is the need of the id. The id doesn’t car about anyone else. This narrator’s indirect characterization shows its confusion between the ego & superego.
“ Now you do as I say “. You pack up these Things and you take them away.” This shows the superego dominating through and winning.
In conclusion to my thoughts, the narrator is torn at the beginning but matures into the superego toward the end.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
My Philosphy of Government
My philosophy on government is that I agree with certain of Lockes and Hobbes. Humans are naturally competitive but human behavior is what causes us to do bad things. Also the government is needed to control and modify human behavior . Also to protect our natural born rights as stated in the Constitution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)