Lawyers case for physical science

I was a secret lawyer and here is my arguements:

Lawyer’s case
Physical science


Good morning ladies and gentleman I’m Khalia Thompson and I’m Micheal Kelly. For the past week my partner and I have went undercover to investigate the violates to the Constitution and to humans.

You will first hear from Micheal Kelly about how the iChip is unsafe. Mike’s essay

The iChip created by various companies have not had an organized and stable testing facility, where the ichip were tested on its impact regarding human civilizations health.

In order for the iChip to be placed back on the market the iChip must be tested by professional scientists. Many trails and experiment must be ran on the iChip in order to conclude if the iChip is safe enough for human use.

The testing facilities must incremented tests on each part of the iChip assuring the 100 percent awareness and dangers of the product.

The iChip is very familiar to when the cell phone was uplifted in the mid 1990s. Some people were diagnoses with brain cancer during the beginning of the cell phone era.

Since many of the companies were getting sued, Congress decided to force the cell phone companies to open testing faculties to test the cell phones relation to brain cancer. The cell phone company found inconclusive results, allowing the cell phone to be placed back on the market.

The chip is unsafe and shouldn’t be or the market. Here are my partner’s arguments.


Yes the iChip would be more business efficient but wouldn’t it take away jobs? Like the computer engineering jobs etc. I f everyone at a business has an iChip then is no need for computers right?

Secondly the iChip violates the Fourth Amendments. Some manufactures put tracking devices their iCip. The Fourth Amendments protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government is seeing your every move. If you were to be at the scene of a crime the government could use this against you and would know you were there because of the tracking devices.

Imagine someone would give you 1 million dollars to make an ipod that record thoughts. This is exactly what is going on. Tab Inc, NTI, L&J, and Increase all are in it for the money. And I went undercover I have direct Quotes for example “ L&J said their only in it for the money and they care about the people but more about the people. This was pretty much the expression I received from all the groups. The 2 million dollars was a huge amount just for designing the iChip. I went undercover because the iChip manufactures won’t publicly admit to their true motives because of self-incrimations. This gives them the right not to publicly incrimate them selves.

Through the iChip has advantages it has too many flaws. The iChip should be immediately taken off the market till testing has been done. Thank You